WebJun 23, 2024 · The term concept of “image rights” was established by Judge Jerome Frank, in the case of Haelan Laboratories, Inc vs. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc where it was discussed that each and every individual possesses the capability to commercialise the intellectual property right in their own image. WebHaelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc 1953 (Haelan won) Haelan was a chewing gum company that had obtained the exclusive right to use a baseball players’ photograph in connection with the sale of gum. The defendant Topps claimed that it had a contract for the use of the same ballplayer’s photograph during that same period.
Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., No.
WebHaelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum Co., 202 F2d 866 (2d Cir. 1953). Judge Swan concurred only in so much of the opinion as dealt with defendant's liability for inducing breach of contract. Hae/an is the first case e-xpressly to recognize a "right of publicity." The Second Circuit cited as authority Liebigs Extract of 'Meat Co. v. Liebig ... WebHaelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum, 12 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 273 (2001) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at … road king bluetooth stereo
The Commercial Appropriation of Personality - Duke University
WebIn the landmark 1953 case of Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum, Judge Jerome Frank first articulated the modern right of publicity as a transferable intellectual property right. The right of publicity has since been seen to protect the strictly commercial value of one’s “persona”—the Latin-derived word meaning the mask of an actor. WebApr 11, 2024 · I will first consider the case often wrongly credited with creating the right of publicity―Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum―and then reveal the right of … WebIn the landmark 1953 case of Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum, Judge Jerome Frank first articulated the modern right of publicity—a transferable intellectual property … road king bluetooth combo kit